﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tabriz University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Research and Development in Medical Education</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2322-2719</Issn>
      <Volume>1</Volume>
      <Issue>2</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2012</Year>
        <Month>12</Month>
        <DAY>25</DAY>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Reviewing Grasha Teaching Methods among Faculty Members of Shiraz Medical School</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage>37</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>43</LastPage>
    <ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.5681/rdme.2012.009</ELocationID>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Mitra</FirstName>
        <LastName>Amini</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Sahar</FirstName>
        <LastName>Samani</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Farhad</FirstName>
        <LastName>Lotfi</LastName>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.5681/rdme.2012.009</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2012</Year>
        <Month>09</Month>
        <Day>23</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>Introduction: Teaching and training are the basic responsibly of a faculty member. One of the fundamental problems of education in the universities is not having a criterion to identify the effective teaching styles. The aim of this study was to determine Grasha teaching method among the faculty Members in Shiraz Medical School. Methods: this descriptive, cross- sectional study was done on 100 faculty members who were selected by census sampling method. Data collection method was Grasha questionnaire which contains 40 questions in 5 sections. Data were analyzed by SPSS 18. Results: All questionnaires were completed. The age range was from 32 to 65 and the mean age was 46. 57% were male. There were 27 PhD, 35 specialists and 38 subspecialists. The highest average score belonged to “Expert” method (2/66±0/55) and the lowest to “Personal” (2± 0/76). 96% of the academic staffs were inclined to “Expert“ method and %97, %83, %78, %80 to “Formal", “Personal", “Delegator“ and “Facilitating“ methods, respectively. There was no significant difference between male and female, but in “Expert” method, the average of females was superior. %77 was under 50 years and %23 over 50. There was no significant difference between elder and younger academic members. No significant difference was found in terms of university degree. Conclusion: This study suggested academic members are inclined to use "Expert” and Delegator methods. Therefore, it is necessary for the academic members to choose a method which creates intellectual excitement among the students through the clarity of teaching content and understanding among individuals that increase the efficiency of their methods.</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Grasha method</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Training</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Teaching method</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>