﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tabriz University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Research and Development in Medical Education</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2322-2719</Issn>
      <Volume>14</Volume>
      <Issue>1</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2025</Year>
        <Month>01</Month>
        <DAY>01</DAY>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Passing mark in medical colleges: Practical insights from resource-limited nations</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage>33384</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>33384</LastPage>
    <ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.34172/rdme.025.33384</ELocationID>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Nawfal R.</FirstName>
        <LastName>Hussein</LastName>
        <Identifier Source="ORCID">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7813-9198</Identifier>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Ahmed A.</FirstName>
        <LastName>Mosa</LastName>
        <Identifier Source="ORCID">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1985-6995</Identifier>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.34172/rdme.025.33384</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2025</Year>
        <Month>08</Month>
        <Day>31</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2025</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <Day>23</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>Medical colleges must establish feasible, consistent, and justifiable passing requirements to ensure the competency and safe practice of medical graduates. However, the passing mark in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remains a subject of debate. The traditional 50% fixed passing mark no longer aligns with the requirements of modern medical education, and the application of the recommended standard-setting methods, which are equitable, defensible, and credible, is not feasible in countries with limited resources. Therefore, this paper analyses the shortcomings of a fixed 50% passing mark and the challenges associated with implementing standard setting in resource-constrained countries, and we argue that adopting a 60% threshold results in more competent medical graduates and proves to be more practical than standard setting in such contexts. </Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Passing mark</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Standard setting</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Medical graduates</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Competency</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Resource-limited nations</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>