Letter to Editor

Flipped learning in medical education: Enhancing engagement through innovative pedagogy

Dear Editor,

Flipped learning has emerged as an innovative instructional approach and a transformative paradigm in medical education.¹ Traditional classroom settings often adhere to a teacher-centered model, wherein instructors deliver lectures and explanations, limiting opportunities for active student engagement. Flipped learning seeks to address this limitation by reversing the instructional process: students engage with instructional content outside of class, followed by participation in interactive activities during class time.² For successful implementation, educators must be well-versed in this pedagogy and adept at designing, implementing, and evaluating strategies that facilitate learning and enhance student outcomes.

Theoretical framework

Flipped learning is grounded in several educational theories that emphasize active engagement and student-centered learning. Constructivism, and Adult Learning Theory are the two most important which are highlighted below:

• Constructivism: Constructivism posits that learners construct knowledge through experiences and reflections. In the context of flipped learning, students engage with content outside the classroom, allowing them to build a foundational understanding at their own pace. This pre-class engagement prepares them for deeper exploration and application of knowledge during in-class activities. Vygotsky’s Social Development Theory also highlights the importance of social interaction in learning, which is facilitated by collaborative in-class activities.³

• Adult learning theory (andragogy): Knowles’ principles of andragogy emphasize that adult learners are self-directed and motivated to learn when they see the relevance of the content to their lives. Flipped learning aligns with this by allowing learners to choose how and when they engage with instructional materials, fostering autonomy and motivation. This approach is particularly effective in medical education, where students are often highly motivated to acquire relevant knowledge and skills.⁴

Integrating these theoretical frameworks into the flipped learning model not only provides a solid foundation for its implementation but also enhances its effectiveness in fostering student engagement and learning outcomes in medical education. By aligning pedagogical strategies with established educational theories, educators can create a more meaningful and impactful learning experience.

Implementation of flipped learning

The successful implementation of the flipped classroom model necessitates careful design and execution of instructional strategies to ensure effective learning experiences. This pedagogical approach has garnered significant attention in health professions education due to its potential to foster learner-centered environments and enhance student engagement.⁵ Effective implementation requires thoughtful planning and the creation of high-quality instructional materials. Educators should design pre-class content that aligns with learning objectives and accommodates varying proficiency levels.⁶ Resources such as video lectures, online materials, and interactive multimedia tools can facilitate content delivery outside the classroom, allowing students to access materials at their convenience.

To maximize the benefits of flipped learning, it is crucial to incorporate engaging and interactive in-class activities.⁷ These activities should promote collaboration, critical thinking, and skill practice. Group discussions, role-plays, debates, and problem-solving tasks provide opportunities for students to apply their knowledge and engage with peers. A primary challenge in implementing flipped learning is ensuring equitable access to necessary technology and digital resources.⁸ Educators can mitigate this challenge by offering alternative access options, such as downloadable materials or physical distribution. Additionally, institutions should work to enhance technology access for students, fostering an equitable learning environment. The advent of online platforms and digital resources has streamlined the delivery of instructional content, enabling meaningful in-class engagement.⁹

Student assessment in flipped learning

In assessing student performance within the flipped classroom framework, traditional assessment methods may require adaptation to align with this learning environment. Formative assessment strategies, including quizzes, polls, and discussions, can effectively gauge students’ understanding of pre-class content and identify areas needing clarification. In-class activities and projects serve as valuable opportunities to assess competencies, problem-solving skills, and collaboration.¹⁰ It is essential for educators to establish mechanisms to monitor student progress throughout the flipped learning experience. Regular check-ins, one-on-one meetings, and feedback sessions can help identify and address individual learning needs, with timely feedback promoting continuous improvement.

Faculty development initiative

Equipping educators with the necessary skills to implement flipped learning effectively is paramount.¹¹ Professional development programs, including workshops, seminars, and online courses, can empower teachers to design engaging instructional materials, create interactive classroom activities, and manage the flipped learning environment effectively. Educators are crucial to the success of any educational initiative, and their development is essential for fostering a supportive learning atmosphere.¹²

In conclusion, flipped learning has significant applications in medical education, with evidence indicating that students prefer this approach over traditional teaching methods, leading to improved learning performance.¹³ The potential of flipped learning to cultivate learner-centered environments and enhance student engagement is undeniable. Educators must design beneficial learning activities and implement flipped learning in a manner that allows students to access materials at their own pace, fostering a personalized learning experience. This shift in instructional delivery encourages self-directed learning and greater student responsibility for their educational journey.

The success of the teaching-learning process hinges on employing methods that actively involve students in the classroom.^14,15 Flipped learning promotes learner engagement and motivation, as students assume an active role in their education. The opportunity to interact with instructional materials outside the classroom enables learners to review content as needed, reinforcing their understanding and retention. In-class activities facilitate the application of knowledge, meaningful peer interactions, and immediate feedback from instructors, fostering a learner-centered environment that enhances critical thinking, problem-solving, and communication skills.

We recommend evaluating educational programs utilizing the CIPP model^16,17 to examine the effects of flipped learning across diverse educational settings. This evaluation will provide insights into the effectiveness of the flipped classroom from multiple perspectives.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

Not applicable.

References

1. Hew KF, Lo CK. Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: a meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ 2018; 18(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1144-z [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
2. Haghani F, Rezaei H, baeigzade A, Eghbali B. Flipped classroom: a pedagogical method. Iran J Med Educ 2016;16(0):104-19. [Persian].
3. Vygotsky LS. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press; 1978.
4. Knowles MS. The Modern Practice of Adult Education; Andragogy Versus Pedagogy. Association Press; 1980.
5. Kızkapan O, Nacaroğlu O, Tüysüz M, Bektas O. Flipped learning studies in science-related disciplines: a meta-synthesis. Kapadokya Eğitim Dergisi 2024; 5(1):112-34. doi: 10.69643/kaped.1433303 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
6. Lo CK, Hew KF, Chen G. Toward a set of design principles for mathematics flipped classrooms: a synthesis of research in mathematics education. Educ Res Rev 2017; 22:50-73. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.002 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
7. Chen MR, Hwang GJ, Chang YY. A reflective thinking-promoting approach to enhancing graduate students’ flipped learning engagement, participation behaviors, reflective thinking and project learning outcomes. Br J Educ Technol 2019; 50(5):2288-307. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12823 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
8. Zainuddin Z, Halili SH. Flipped classroom research and trends from different fields of study. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 2016; 17(3):313-40. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2274 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
9. Strayer JF. How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learn Environ Res 2012; 15(2):171-93. doi: 10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
10. Tucker B. The flipped classroom. Education Next 2012; 12(1):82-3. [ Google Scholar]
11. Cox KM. Teachers’ Descriptions of Effective Professional Development Provided to Implement a Blended Learning Flipped Classroom [dissertation]. Grand Canyon University; 2020.
12. Vali L, Shokoohi M, Beigzadeh A. Characteristics of a capable university teacher the viewpoints of faculty members of health services management department in Iranian medical universities. Iran J Med Educ 2014;14(2):90-100. [Persian].
13. Ghafoor S, Abiodullah M. Effect of flipped classroom approach on higher secondary students’ academic performance. Educational Research and Innovation 2024; 4(1):184-97. [ Google Scholar]
14. Bahmanbijar B, Nazarieh M, Toufan N, Dehghani MR, Beigzadeh A. Identification of the reasons behind students’ lack of participation in classroom activities using a Delphi technique. Future Med Educ J 2019; 9(2):10-7. [ Google Scholar]
15. Beigzadeh A, Haghani F. Active learning methods: a way of tackling large classroom setting. Strides in Development of Medical Education 2016;13(1):107-113. [Persian].
16. Bazrafshan A, Haghdoost A, Rezaie H, Beigzadeh A. A practical framework for evaluating health services management educational program: the application of the mixed-method sequential explanatory design. Res Dev Med Educ 2015; 4(1):47-54. doi: 10.15171/rdme.2015.008 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
17. Okhovati M, Yazdi Feyzabadi V, Beigzadeh A, Shokoohi M, Mehrolhassani MH. Evaluating the program of bachelor degree in health services management at Kerman University of Medical Sciences Iran using the CIPP model (context input process product). Strides in Development of Medical Education 2014;11(1):101-13. [Persian].