Logo-rdme
Res Dev Med Educ. 2022;11: 13.
doi: 10.34172/rdme.2022.013
  Abstract View: 634
  PDF Download: 340

Original Research

Effectiveness of an operating room master of science program based on Kirkpatrick’s model

Mina Amiri 1 ORCID logo, Marzieh Momennasab 1 ORCID logo, Shahrzad Yektatalab 2 ORCID logo, Saeed Hamidizadeh 1 ORCID logo, Zahra Rahimi 3 ORCID logo, zohreh Badiyepeymaiejahromi 3* ORCID logo

1 Department of Nursing, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
2 Department of Mental Health and Psychiatric Nursing, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
3 Department of Nursing, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Email: z.badiyepeyma@gmail.com

Abstract

Background: Evaluation is one of the most critical issues in the training process. Kirkpatrick’s model is one method in educational evaluation that can accurately evaluate programs. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an operating room master of scienc (MS) program om based on Kirkpatrick’s model.

Methods: This descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted using convenience sampling with 46 students and graduates from the operating room MS degree at the Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in the academic year 2020-2021. A valid and reliable questionnaire with 47 items in three levels of reaction, learning, and performance was used to evaluate the opinions of graduates and students. The survey was sent to their email addresses and returned to the researcher after completion.

Results: Kirkpatrick’s evaluation model showed that the overall evaluation of the operating room program was 70.97±9.32, which can be considered a moderate level. Students’ satisfaction with the program was moderate (68.00±14.97); their learning (84.54±15.69) and performance (84.30±9.28) were evaluated to be at a reasonable level.

Conclusion: Considering the average effectiveness of the whole program, it is suggested that the educational managers of the operating room department plan and attempt to increase their indicators by considering the weaknesses and strengths of the program.

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 634

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 340

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 25 Jan 2022
Revision: 16 May 2022
Accepted: 17 May 2022
ePublished: 23 Jul 2022
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)