Logo-rdme
Res Dev Med Educ.14 :33323. doi: 10.34172/rdme.025.33323

Letter to the Editor

Artificial intelligence and ethical conflicts in healthcare

Omid Ebrahimi Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, , * ORCID logo
Delaram Mohammadi Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, ORCID logo

Author information:
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, The University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

*Corresponding author: Omid Ebrahimi, Email: ebrahimi_O@tabrizu.ac.ir

Copyright and License Information

© 2025 The Author(s).
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, as long as the original authors and source are cited. No permission is required from the authors or the publishers.

Funding Statement

Not applicable.

Dear Editor,

In recent years, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare has evolved from theoretical concepts to real-world applications. This technology is rapidly becoming a fundamental component of modern healthcare, offering unparalleled capabilities in diagnosis, treatment planning, patient care, and healthcare management.1 AI refers to the ability of machines to mimic human cognitive capabilities, such as learning from data and making informed judgments.2 When AI is applied in healthcare, it assists professionals in making more informed decisions, enabling personalized, efficient, and accessible healthcare.3 This allows healthcare providers to balance quality improvement programs and patient needs, which are critical for patient safety, long-term health, and life-saving interventions.4

However, deploying AI technologies to manage vast amounts of data while ensuring security concerns such as integrity control, data confidentiality, authentication, and authorization remains a challenge. Additionally, achieving comprehensive outcomes across diverse populations is difficult, as medical data is often private and tailored to individual conditions.5 Thus, the use of this technology is accompanied by numerous ethical challenges and conflicts that require careful examination and attention. This letter examines the ethical conflicts associated with the use of AI in the healthcare domain, which include:

  1. Privacy and data security: AI requires vast amounts of personal and sensitive patient data to function effectively. This raises concerns about maintaining privacy and ensuring data security. Misuse of this data could have serious consequences for patients.6

  2. Algorithmic bias: AI algorithms may be trained on incomplete or non-diverse datasets, which can lead to racial, gender, or social biases. These biases can exacerbate discrimination in the delivery of healthcare services.7

  3. Accountability and transparency: In cases of diagnostic or treatment errors caused by AI, determining accountability can be challenging. Additionally, the transparency of how algorithms make decisions is often limited, which can undermine the trust of patients and healthcare professionals.8

  4. Impact on the doctor-patient relationship: The use of AI may affect the traditional doctor-patient relationship. Patients might feel that human interaction and empathy in the treatment process have been diminished.9

  5. Equity in access to technology: Access to advanced AI technologies may be limited in underserved areas or developing countries. This could exacerbate existing inequalities in access to healthcare services.10


Conclusion

AI has great potential to improve healthcare, but the ethical conflicts associated with it require serious attention. To fully exploit this technology, the following steps need to be taken: (1) Develop ethical rules and regulations for the use of AI in healthcare. (2) Increase data diversity to reduce algorithmic bias. (3)Train health professionals in the effective and ethical use of AI. (4) Increase transparency and accountability in AI decision-making.

By resolving these conflicts, AI can be used as a powerful and ethical tool in improving healthcare.


Competing Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


Ethical Approval

Not applicable.


References

  1. Maleki Varnosfaderani S, Forouzanfar M. The role of AI in hospitals and clinics: transforming healthcare in the 21st century. Bioengineering (Basel) 2024; 11(4):337. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11040337 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  2. Sahoo RK, Sahoo KC, Negi S, Baliarsingh SK, Panda B, Pati S. Health professionals’ perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns 2025; 134:108680. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2025.108680 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  3. Singh AP, Saxena R, Saxena S, Maurya NK. Artificial intelligence revolution in healthcare: transforming diagnosis, treatment, and patient care. Asian J Adv Res 2024; 7(1):241-63. [ Google Scholar]
  4. El-Jerjawi NS, Murad WF, Harazin D, Qaoud AN, Jamala MN, Abu-Nasser BS. The role of artificial intelligence in revolutionizing health: challenges, applications, and future prospects. Int J Acad Appl Res 2024; 8(9):7-15. [ Google Scholar]
  5. Aminizadeh S, Heidari A, Dehghan M, Toumaj S, Rezaei M, Jafari Navimipour N. Opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence and distributed systems to improve the quality of healthcare service. Artif Intell Med 2024; 149:102779. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2024.102779 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  6. Gerke S, Rezaeikhonakdar D. Privacy aspects of direct-to-consumer artificial intelligence/machine learning health apps. Intell Based Med 2022; 6:100061. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmed.2022.100061 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  7. Obermeyer Z, Powers B, Vogeli C, Mullainathan S. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science 2019; 366(6464):447-53. doi: 10.1126/science.aax2342 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  8. Mennella C, Maniscalco U, De Pietro G, Esposito M. Ethical and regulatory challenges of AI technologies in healthcare: a narrative review. Heliyon 2024; 10(4):e26297. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26297 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  9. Heudel PE, Crochet H, Blay JY. Impact of artificial intelligence in transforming the doctor–cancer patient relationship. ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology 2024; 3:100026. doi: 10.1016/j.esmorw.2024.100026 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  10. Dankwa-Mullan I. Health equity and ethical considerations in using artificial intelligence in public health and medicine. Prev Chronic Dis 2024; 21:E64. doi: 10.5888/pcd21.240245 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]

Submitted: 13 Mar 2025
Accepted: 23 Mar 2025
First published online: 15 Apr 2025
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - FireFox Plugin)

Abstract View: 711
PDF Download: 454
Full Text View: 10